Why am I right? Do you feel the pain accessing to the Internet? I do. The Internet
Of course, wires are not necessary. That enables competition and, actually, that enables evolution of local ISPs. Yesterday we preferred company A, today we vote for the company B. Some time ago that competition was forcing providers to propose faster and cheaper service plans, but I suppose that certain limit is reached here. E.g. an average consumer is satisfied by 2Mbps unlim and do not care for 5, 7 or 10Mbps.
Of course, faster traffic plans are desired for many tasks. But it is not a problem of limited access anymore. It is a problem of QoS. It is like I can turn 4KWt of consumer electronics in my flat or 10KWt. You see, this is not a reasonable direction for competition in electricity providing. An average person consumes certain amount of electricity. If someone desires more, he orders a dedicated line, but most of us are satisfied.
The Internet access is very similar. There is some standard value which is enough for the most of consumers. A standard could be estabilished and used in construction of domestic buildings. Some freaks will order 1Gb dedicated lines, but that will not change the overall picture.
So the competition is not really necessary in the Internet Access Service and moreover, it cause a lot of pain for consumers. There is such thing as electricity, I could just plug in my notebook in any place to charge its battery, and it is unlikely that the owner of that place will blame me in stealing his electricity. There is the Internet, but I could not plug in it at any place. ISP ask for the authentication, blaming me that otherwise I will steal its Internet traffic. So silly.
And so what? OK, The Internet is accepted as a natural monopoly and all of us have unified access in wi-fi range of the "Internet outlets". So what?
The most direct impact is on handheld devices and communicators. Local application vendors suck (cheers to Microsoft Office), cellular service providers suck (hello VoIP), botnets are on the move. Any amount of speculations could be placed here, with one main resume. Everybody is ready on these markets, so new event will cause leaders to change their places, but no revolution will emerge here. Again, this is a question of QoS, and this is not a principal issue.
The most interesting thing is Internet-enabled consumer devices. This is the most interesting topic here. As soon as the Internet Access is unified and treated similarly to the electricity access, consumer electronics has no choice but face a Revolution. This will open a kind of new dimension in the market, with intermediate stages of either creation of new simple consumer electronics to integrate with existing web-services (hello Google) or creating new web-services to support existing consumer electronics (hello Apple). And I really believe that this will be the new Bubble-Market, and the next Most-Capitalized-Hi-Tec-Company will breed somewhere in that swamp.
And the last thought. To succeed here, a company should have a good "cushion stock" of semi-product ideas, solutions, devices etc. I bet that major players will be too slow on the maneuver. Consumer device vendors will think about web-services as supplement for their real gadgets. IT-companies will treat consumer electronics as material plane of their web-services. The only and the one who will be able see the overall picture without seeng the objects double will succeed. And trust me, sometime it will have bought Google Search.
Сохранить как черновик
Hey, guys, that's the Chance! :-)
